In the News   

 

October 12, 2000

Debate II

Better, Not Great
Bush Scores Again, But No Knockout

A note about “debate formats.”  A lot of media commentary has focused on how the setting of the debates, standing, sitting, etc, plays to the strengths or weaknesses of either debater.  The debate format shouldn’t really matter, a guy should be able to think and talk in any civil setting.  Nonetheless, if formats matter so much, maybe we should make the debate setting truly challenging: Have the candidates debate in front of their nude wives (surely this would encourage 3rd party candidates), add a correspondent from High Times to the question panel, allow each candidate 5 minutes to deploy cheerleaders, and above all, allow and encourage hoots and howls of derision, plus tossed vegetables, from the live audience.  And, sponsor immediate Internet voting on the winner, with the loser being immediately led off and shot. 

George W. Bush - as he did in the first debate - proved again last evening that he is just as capable - if not moreso - of occupying the Oval Office as Veep Al Gore (and as an aside, that neither are as qualified as Pat Buchanan).  

And as might be expected, Bush improved on his performance in the first debate, being more at ease in the “roundtable” format and exhibiting more confidence.  Gore, by contrast, successfully caricatured as a bully from his overbearing demeanor in Debate One, came across as timid and panty-waisted.

But Bush supporters, while exhaling with relief that their man hasn’t tripped badly in either debate, still can’t rest easy following last night’s fracas.  Gore and the Democrats are dangerous opponents and clever; they are not above or beneath anything which will secure for their candidate his “rightful” coronation as Billa-bub’s liar apparent.   Gore himself must be “feeling his own pain” (and frustration) at coming across in Debate One as a pompous know-it-all, and in Debate Two as an overly tepid promise-spouting martinet.  Gore is a member of the most politically shrewd Administration, Party, and mouthpieces ever cobbled together to do harm.  He is not going to let this last shot at the Big Prize slip from his grasp without a down and dirty balls-kicking and hair-pulling scramble.  Gore, just as he twisted his extreme anti-gun message into moderation last evening, Gore will be double-barrel loaded for Bush next Tuesday. One can only hope and suppose viewers will see yet another unfinished yet heavily varnished version of Al Gore, National Debate Twit.  Will the real Al Gore please tip over?  And will both candidates please sharpen their cleats?

No More Santa -

Polar-Trajectory Missiles Aplenty

Goddanmit George: Gore did it again last night, impossibly making several competing priorities his “number one priority.”   When are you going to point out this pandering bullshit?  And there was Al Gore Enviro-twit, scaring the living shit out of as-yet-unborn Santa-believers by saying that in 50 years, the North Pole will be melted away.  What an ass!  Even the “paper of record” New York Times, which initially reported the dubious notion of a melting North Pole, had to correct itself and say that the reported science was totally unscrutinized and probably wrong. 

But technological progress in bad parts of the world make it likely that 2- and 3-stage ballistic missiles will be heading our way, bearing gifts of nuclear, and chemico-bio warheads. 

Bush partisans might take heart that their man is now being perceived as being “on a roll” of sorts, and that if he can still further improve going into the final debate next Tuesday, he will be glad-handing and jaywalking down Pennsylvania Avenue come January 20, 1001.  But don’t count on this Saturday stroll.

George Bush did not score as decisive a victory as some are exulting.  Bush did well and certainly better than “super-debater” Al Gore.  But Bush had better not sit back as he did following the GOP convention and let Al regain his dorkball wits.  Bush has cuffed Gore up a little, he is backing him up, but he needs to put and keep Gore on the ropes this week, and then punch the Big Twitbag Liar to the canvas next Tuesday.  We can look forward next week to some real blood, it will be a eye-gouge and knee-groin affair, and frankly Gore has the edge here, unless Bush can keep his cool and come across above the filthy flinging fray.  (From a “debate format” perspective, perhaps allowing each candidate some pepper-spray and bullwhips might work.  And as always, the loser is summarily shot directly following the debate.)

If the polls start going Bush’s way, you can bet that Al, seeing his last real shot at getting into the Oval Office’s exalted Lewinsky Chair, will stop at nothing to tear down Bush in hopes of hail-marying out the election.  Please polls, open up for Bush, just to provoke a desperate Al debate performance.

Debate Two was mild - the opening foreign-policy discussions saw Gore and Bush largely agreeing.   This tameness plays into Bush’s hands.  The talk largely centered around the notion of the military’s role in “nation-building” – deploying into trouble spots and then staying as long as it takes for the locals to stabilize a government and run their own affairs.  Gore tends to think this can be a military’s responsibility.  Bush disagrees with using the United States armed forces this way, insisting instead that the military should do one thing and do it well: fight and win wars.  After the military has done their jobs, it would be a matter of local and diplomatic and civilian authorities to sort winners and losers and mop up the blood and guts.

Bush did mention missile defense, just a mere mention that whetted a rabid ABM-supporter’s chops but left little for the tummy.  Goddamnit!  When is someone going to grab this issue by the nutsack and lead the American people to safety from blackmail and third world nuclear threat?

Don’t you fire me!

I’m GAY!

As expected, Gore could only repeat his pandering from Debate One.  Bush was able to expand into the foreign policy arena with some success, and made some moderate and well-chosen points on gun control.   Bush was at his very best when he said that “gays and lesbians” should be entitled to the same rights as everyone else, and not “special rights.”  Gore by contrast wants to pass laws that will make it illegal for companies to fire somebody because they’re “gay or lesbian.” 

One can foresee the incredible advantage such a law gives to sub-standard gay workers: a manager would be afraid to terminate such a worker for fear on an inevitable lawsuit.  Thus the private sector would be forced to subsidize substandard gay workers.  Bush answered in effect, no business would fire any productive worker regardless of any perceived “minority status.”  And Bush is right – very few businesses are so homophobic that they would not hire and vigorously retain valuable worker regardless of their sexual activities or any other reason short of criminal behavior. 

Bush takes a positive privacy-oriented approach.  Gore prefers the negative: businesses would be forced to carry substandard gay or lesbian workers for fear of lawsuits and public approbation.  In effect, gays and lesbians would have special protections and rights.  Now that’s a real incentive to be “gay” even if you’re not!  Me personally, as soon as I get an inkling my boss was thinking of canning me for something as frivolous as me not performing the job I’m paid to do, I’d report to work dressed as a trampy broad.  Don’t put this past me.  I’d alert gay groups ACT-UP and Lambda to rally to my transvestite defense, and dare my boss to fire me on pain of lawsuit and bad Op-ed brickbats in the New York Times.

Towards the end of the debate, an overconfident and relaxed Bush let some of his own innate and annoyingly Gorish cockiness show through.  Bush will be wise to alter this posture forthwith.  Just as a fatuous Gore had his nuts cut off following the first debate for being such a spastic and pushy boob, such outcry could be turned against a suddenly perceived “bully” Bush.  The media would like nothing better than to parrot such a catchy irony.  Fortunately, Bush has a counterbalancing geniality, which tamps down perceptions of arrogance.

During the minor dust-up at the end where Gore was slamming Bush’s Texas record and Bush was highlighting Gore’s lying, Gore admitted “I made some mistakes on some details” even uttering the word “sorry” (which his President never did!). Why didn’t Bush point out that Gore is considered one of the most detail-oriented policy-spouting wonkheads in politics?  And Gore made a “mistake” with “a few details?”  Come on!!  That defense is a wet paper bag!

Victim Hillary –

And Bye-bye Billa

One final note about debates and debate spin.  Rick Lazio took a major media black-eye for being so bold as to merely approach Hillary Rodham’s podium and in effect show her a piece of paper during their first debate.  It wasn’t a bad tactic, but the outcry against Rick following the debate was cacophonous – poor wittle Hillary Rodham had her “personal space” invaded by bully Rick!  Ever the shrewy chameleon, Hillary quickly adopted her always successfully deployed “victim” cloak.  We all saw how in the second Lazio/Rodham debate, just as Al Gore last night backed way off against Bush, Lazio put back on the kid gloves and let Hillary control and dominate their exchanges.  Against Hillary Rodham, you NEVER put on velvet gloves.  Against that terrible frozen-feature face you NEVER cease looking for a way to crack it with a rhetorical iron fist that will send the carpetbagging self-entitled bitch trouncing back from wherever it is (Illinois? Arkansas?  Washington D.C.? Cahppaqua?) she comes from.  One would’ve thought Lazio would beat Rodham handily in this race.  Then again, one supposes that a majority of New Yorkers aren’t the biggest bunch of self-centered, pot-eyed, and turd-brained bunch of political assholes from any state.  And yet they are.  “Big Time!”

Both in New York, and nationally, we need more partisanship, not less.  We need name-calling and even outright slander and libelous commentary and tossed veggies from all candidates for all offices.  How else, otherwise, to tell the candidates apart?  Yes George Bush’s early adult coke-use should be fair game – who knows maybe he still toots?  And yes, every one of Al Gore’s casual and asinine lies should be held up for ridicule and debasement, because of course, he still lies. “Big Time!”

If we suppose that Hillary Rodham wins New York, and Gore loses nationally, where does this leave B.J. Clinton?  He will now be playing second fiddle to his wife the new Hollywood/

Gotham celeb, barging from NY to DC to LA.  And Bill’s boy-apparent Al Gore will be banished to the political wastelands and may even have to go live in Tennessee.  With Hillary safely engaged in “the nation’s business,” Billa-bub has a free hand and zip to head for his natural home, Hollywood, to get all the gash he wants (and in L.A. that will be a LOT.)   Kind of a reverse Ronald Reagan, who, taking a more statesmanlike course, started in Hollywood and finished in the Oval Office. 

As usual, and maddeningly so for his detractors, Billa-bub wins whatever happens.  Is it pure envy and grudging broadslamming admiration to say I can’t stand the guy?  You bet it is!  I am pissed because in order for me to keep my job after an egregious workplace violation, I have to dress like a woman and scream “homo discrimination!”  Not that I mind, but Billa gets to keep his job even after getting a Whale of a Hum-diddly-doo right in his Oval Office chair!  And while making policy phone calls, to boot!  How cool is that?   

The only winner in this upcoming election is really and truly Billa-bub Jeff Clinton, pussy-master extraordinaire, and the most accomplished liar and dame-disser who ever unzipped on this earth.  It is ripe horseshit that Billy Blow came up from hard times in Arkansas, the kid then and the kid now has lived one of the easiest lives in the 20th Century.   His well-connected horse-betting and streak-haired momma greased his skids all through childhood.  His powergrubbing Stalinesque “wife” gave him all the pecker-privileges and bare-ass cover he wanted from then on, no questions necessary.  There is no punishment too great for Billa-bub, and that is why, ironically, he suffers none.  Such depravity on earth calls into question the entire “fear the lord” concept.

--Dick Acorn