|
February, 2008
Witch Hunt
Roger Clemens Gets Burned at the Stake
Here's the key part of the Roger Clemens
interview with Mike Wallace on CBS's 60 Minutes in early January 2008:
CLEMENS: I don’t know if I can
defend myself, I think people — a lot of people have already
made their decisions.
WALLACE: Well, a lot of people
have made ...
CLEMENS: And that’s our
country, isn’t it? Guilty before innocent. That’s the way
our country works now. And then everybody’s talking about
sue, sue, sue. Should I sue? Well, let me exhaust. Let me,
let me just spend. How about, let’s keep spending. But I’m
gonna explore what I can do and then I want to see if it’s
gonna be worth it; worth all the headache.
|
 |
WALLACE (hand nervously covering mouth):
How about a lie detector test?
CLEMENS: Some say they’re good. Some say
they’re not. Do whatever. I mean —
WALLACE: So as far as you’re concerned
you would conceivably?
CLEMENS: Yeah. I don’t know if they’re
good or bad.
This is the point at which Roger Clemens
argument crashed down like a house of cards. The transcript reveals he
said "yeah"; those who watched the interview know that that was the
weakest "yeah" you'll ever see -- his answer before it ("some say
they're good. Some say they're not.") and after ("I don't know if
they're good or bad") had him shirking away from a lie detector test.
Here's how Roger Clemens should have answered this question, and the
whole controversy, if I were him:
|
 |
WALLACE (hand nervously covering mouth):
How about a lie detector test?
ME AS ROGER CLEMENS: I would love to take a lie
detector test, Mike.
WALLACE: You'll take a lie detector test right
here then?
|
ME AS ROGER CLEMENS: Not on your program so you
can get all the attention and advertising revenue, Mike, no. I'm willing
to do it in a public venue -- on one condition. I want every major
league baseball player who has played the game the last 15 years to
take the same lie detector test with me. I want the Commissioner of
Baseball up there with us to take the same lie detector test. I want
George Mitchell to take the test, and ask him different questions,
like why it is his report said at least 50 percent of players were
taking steroids -- which would be hundreds of players over the
course of the last 15 years, but he only specified 40 in his report
-- making those players sacrificial lambs. I want to give him a lie
detector test and ask him why he did that. To smooth over this whole
situation -- create a witch hunt to placate the fans? I want to know
if his involvement with baseball at the ownership level affected his
report.
And I want you to join us up there, Mike. I'll
have a different set of questions for you. I want to know if you had
any suspicions of steroids use in baseball at any time in the last
15 years, and why you've decided to have a big "special report" on
it now? I want every member of the media up there too, to ask them
the same questions. When balls were flying out of ballparks like we
were all in some sort of cartoon. Where were you Mike? Were you
simply not observant, or did you not want to "upset the applecart"?
What's going on now? You sense that it's ok to swoop in like a
vulture and jump on the bandwagon of this story and make a lot of
money on it?
Will you take a lie detector test Mike?
That's the interview I would have loved to
see. And that's the line of attack Clemens should have used with the
Senate investigative committee. Ask Representatives Elijah Cummings, and
Tom Davis, and Dan Burton why they were spending tax payer dollars on
this witch hunt. Ask them to explain why they had asked only a few
players to appear before Congress when the Mitchell report said over 50
percent of baseball players were involved. Give them a lie detector
test. Why hasn't Bud Selig, the
Commissioner of Baseball, taken the stand? Why isn't George Mitchell up
there, explaining how he can state so many were taking them, but then
only implicate a chosen few?
And this is where Roger Clemens screwed up -- his
denials have turned this whole story on him -- making him the focus,
when the focus really should be on the Commissioner of Baseball, ALL
baseball players (50 to 80 percent of whom were taking steroids
according to Mitchell and Jose Canseco), ALL baseball owners and
management, ALL of the media including Mike Wallace, and ALL of the fans
too.
Baseball fans knew what was happening as it happened.
Steroids were the "in" thing in the late nineties -- we even witnessed
companies launching ad campaigns such as "Like your career on steroids".
And we accepted that, as if it were a good thing. Somewhere along the
line, steroids became bad -- reports that little Johnny a high school
football player, developed testicular cancer at 17 because he was taking
steroids caused people to see that there was an epidemic going on --
kids were emulating their superheros and coming down with cancer.
When Chad Curtis of the NY Yankees in 1998 asked a
reporter rhetorically "look around this clubhouse; tell me half of these
guys aren't on steroids" -- according to articles in the NY Post at that
time, Curtis immediately became ostracized by other players on the team,
until his sorry ass was traded a few months later. The press at large
let the story die.
Now the tide has turned; it is witch hunting season.
Roger Clemens is a grade-A1, certifiable witch. Draw up the stake!
--
LouV
|
Tell Us What You Think: If
you'd like to respond to this article,
click here.
|
|
|
|